The upholding of one's principles is certainly a crucial test of character. Social conventions and the conformance to it however seems to have little to do with it.
If we were in a Gallilean era it would seem only too obvious that it takes great strength of character not to adapt, but to voice an opinion contrary to prevailing social conventions and opinions. People have been burnt at the stake for expressing then heretic notions of the earth's position in relation to the sun and the other planets.
In contrast, in an era where individuality and freedom is revered, the table seems to have turned now, and condemning of social conventions when it appears in conflict with one's principles is not as uncommon. The examples are not just restricted to the hairdos of an Elvis or the gyrating motions of a Michael Jackson. With the gay and lesbian movement gaining traction, more people are open about their sexual orientations than ever before for instance.
In reality however, while a crucial test of character involves upholding one's principles, it seems that social conformance has little to do with it. It is important to see that social convention is a two-faced coin: on the one extreme it reflects the sentiments, mores and tradition of people. On the other extreme, it could reflect parochial and dangerously ingrained thinking. The use of the burkah by islamic women might seem in violation with one's principles of equal rights to women, but it could tread on sensitive traditions and beliefs in some societies for example. It is important to note that acceptance of a social convention, doesn't necessarily mean sacrificing of one's principles. One could for example fight for equal rights for women in education and in the workplace, without stepping on the dressing preferences of women.
out of time!
